<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Agree with all who say the movie shows so finely we don't know exactly who/ what is manipulating everything. <br><br>Sent from my iPad</div><div><br>On May 25, 2015, at 6:52 PM, David Morris <<a href="mailto:fqmorris@gmail.com">fqmorris@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>Mark!</div><div><br></div>R U Cirius loosing baby teeth on Golden Fang's meaning?<div>Rilly? Ciriusly?</div><div>Start a list, and connect the dots, just like Doc's whiteboard. Then smoke some chronic. It will all make sense, and then it won't. Then it might again, or knot.</div><div><br></div><div>David Morris<br><div><br>On Monday, May 25, 2015, Mark Kohut <<a href="mailto:mark.kohut@gmail.com">mark.kohut@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div>So, why and what meaning the Golden Fang? </div><div><br></div><div>Wolfson, why, what? <br><br>Sent from my iPad</div><div><br>On May 25, 2015, at 6:01 PM, David Morris <<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','fqmorris@gmail.com');" target="_blank">fqmorris@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>Yes. The "makes sense" aspect does make it *less* Pynchonian. But that's OK.<br><br>On Monday, May 25, 2015, John Bailey <<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sundayjb@gmail.com');" target="_blank">sundayjb@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">The movie is a neater, more streamlined version of the book. Made<br>
total sense to me, ie there were no loose ends or cryptic signifiers<br>
that left me scratching my head. Seriously don't get the reviewers who<br>
said 'not getting it is the point!'<br>
<br>
Then again, all of this kind of makes it *less* Pynchonian, but still<br>
kinda more enjoyable than the book itself imho.<br>
<br>
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Dave Monroe <<a>against.the.dave@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> <a href="http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/inherent-vice-from-page-to-screen-the-6-biggest-changes-from-the-book-20141215" target="_blank">http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/inherent-vice-from-page-to-screen-the-6-biggest-changes-from-the-book-20141215</a><br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/12/19/inherent_vice_book_vs_movie_how_pynchon_s_novel_paul_thomas_anderson_s_movie.html" target="_blank">http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/12/19/inherent_vice_book_vs_movie_how_pynchon_s_novel_paul_thomas_anderson_s_movie.html</a><br>
><br>
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 4:49 PM, David Morris <<a>fqmorris@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> I just now saw IV movie on DVD. I liked it a lot. Might the movie be better<br>
>> than the book? Is there a source that judges how close the movie and book<br>
>> compare? Still, it felt a lot like Pynchon to me.<br>
>><br>
>> David Morris<br>
>><br>
> -<br>
> Pynchon-l / <a href="http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l" target="_blank">http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>