<div><div>Neither the writers nor the characters were Jewish, so I doubt the second definition. I think the term is used in its original etymology, as a large, all-consuming fire.</div><div><br/></div><div>Laura </div><div><br/></div><div><font style="color:#333333"><i>Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID</i></font></div></div><br><br>Jochen Stremmel <jstremmel@gmail.com> wrote:<br><br><div dir="ltr"><div>Given when the line was written (by Donald Ogden Stewart) it's probably the second meaning:<br><br>noun<br>1 destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire or nuclear war: a nuclear holocaust | the threat of imminent holocaust.<br>• (the Holocaust) the mass murder of Jews under the German Nazi regime during the period 1941–45. More than 6 million European Jews, as well as members of other persecuted groups, such as gypsies and homosexuals, were murdered at concentration camps such as Auschwitz.<br>2 historical a Jewish sacrificial offering that is burned completely on an altar.<br><br></div>and not so jarring.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-12-01 17:31 GMT+01:00 <a href="mailto:kelber@mindspring.com">kelber@mindspring.com</a> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kelber@mindspring.com" target="_blank">kelber@mindspring.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>It calls to mind The Philadelphia Story (1940 ), where a drunken Jimmy Stewart gushes romantically to Katherine Hepburn that when he looks in her eyes he sees "... holocausts ...". Always jarring, given when the line was spoken.</div><div><br></div><div>Laura </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><font style="color:#333333"><i>Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID</i></font></div></div><br><br>Mark Kohut <<a href="mailto:mark.kohut@gmail.com" target="_blank">mark.kohut@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br><div dir="ltr">published in 1927, Ms Woolf has a character who thinks<div>dramatically, shall we say, use this word to describe a </div><div>major disaster that does not happen regarding her husband</div><div>and a situation....."not a holocaust" she says to herself.....</div><div><br></div><div>Where it also does not contain the burning/ burnt offering </div><div>major meaning of the word long before the historic Holocaust</div><div>but is used as Pynchon does in GR, I believe. (along with the </div><div>established 'burning' meaning but not directly alluding to the Holocaust, </div><div>I also think I remember, without looking anything up. )</div><div><br></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>