literary exhaustion

Michael G. Koopman koopman at ctc.com
Thu Jul 13 07:05:28 CDT 1995


David, you seem a bit choppy in your background

> how do fans respond to this kind of blank categorization.

You seem not to have embedded generalities in your pole, without
trying to choke off discussion, fans are usually impulsive and might
react in mass turbulence to any smearing of their idols life on the
street of dreams (and nightmare) on which they live and bus plunge.

> you see Pynchon being accepted by the next generation? Is his place

If you brush up on the ratings associated with such concepts you might
consider how "theocratic" academia asserts itself, and in such not
inquire as to whether a best seller may arise.  It is the critical
mass that generates the next generation nucleating similarity within
itself creating alike (by jiminy) critics from age to age.  Wouldn't
you knows this as the case in canning the ring theory comparatively
speaking, though extensive theoretical enhancements for various
numbers of sales and other functants may induce non-monoticity where
once a rock solid foundation was assumed.

But in reducing you dual question through subsumptive measures might
it be best to remain, if you ples., on _GR_ and then move forward the
bricks in the wall out towards _Lot49_ and V.?  This also implicates
about whether it is cows leaping over the door knockers that has the
most to do with relativistic colors arising at the end of the rainbow
of fruit flavors that saddle up in soppa pia concepts towards casting
these p'ole questors about treats as an anagram of life, savor our sol
tropical tan lines wishing to wonton knows?  Or need I switch channels
in order to win such luxuriant queen for a day answers?  This is in
line with the 9.5 WOR NEWs prescription your dag'sters ordered.

Loppi'n yer'ear lobes, disco ball tex's droppy pella glass eyes,

Mikey -- internet: koopman at ctc.com phone: +1-814-269-2637




More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list