V.
ckaratnytsky at nypl.org
ckaratnytsky at nypl.org
Fri Jun 21 11:04:14 CDT 1996
OK, I'm game, deep breath, here goes:
SUCK HOUR!
I know, I know, it's shamelessly predictable, but what the heck: This
is the first free-for-all, piss-stop, cyber-convergence,
what-have-you on the V. coach party. Grip, still cranky? How's that
seat feel? The dolphin boy, Teen Age Riot's awake, but how 'bout the
rest of you? Straighten out those Godzilla t-shirts and pull up those
ill-fitting pants!
Having expended all of my more trenchant ruminations on images and
tauntings of anadromous (don't know that that means? well, look it
up) Steely, I have managed to muster a few random questions, which,
though they may serve only to expose me as an ignoramus (pomo poser
that I am), are submitted in the spirit of "oh, well, it wouldn't be
the first time." Maybe we can consider these as something resembling
a starting point for our discussion of this Pynchonian Pentateuch.
Thus:
1. Chapter 1. The paragraph which begins "Since his discharge from
the Navy Profane had been road-laboring and when there wasn't work
just traveling, up and down the east coast like a yo-yo..." (Harper
Perennial paperback, p. 10) What visions does this paragraph conjure?
A-and--why is it dark in the east and why are there no more bars?
2. Chapter 1. "Love for an object..." (HP, p.23) Oy V., oy
vey--any illumination that can be shed on the many vexing female
characters would be appreciated. (Later, Christ!--bierhalle Hanne
with her "cowlike" calm. This word makes me want to scream.)
3. Chapter 2. "Since 1945, Herbert Stencil had been on a conscious
campaign to do without sleep. Before 1945 he had been slothful..."
(HP, p. 54) Why is Stencil, former dharma bum, being linked to
Arjuna, famous conqueror of sloth? Is there more to Stencil than his
existential quest (as if that weren't enough)?
4. Chapter 3. What is the point of the arrangement of this chapter?
I'm not sure I "get" the perspective given by these
almost-Hitchcockian vignettes--"the space of this vantage." (HP,
p.94)
5. Chapter 4. "Schoenmaker, being conservative, referred to his
profession as the art of Tagliacozzi." (HP, p.97) Quite the nose
job, eh?
6. Chapter 5.
Opener: "The alligator was pinto: pale white, seaweed black. It
moved fast but clumsy. It could have been lazy, or old or stupid.
Profane thought maybe it was tired of living." (HP, p.111)
Then: " 'V. came to me tonight, upset. She and Paul have been at it
again. The weight of guilt is so heavy on the child. She almost sees
it: as a huge, white lumbering beast, pursuing her, wanting to devour
her...' " (HP, p. 121)
Finally: "At half past one the phone rang. It was Stencil.
'Stencil's just been shot at,' he said." (HP, p.131)
How does Stencil transmogrify from Arjuna into an alligator (and so
soon yet)? And, more: Does this mean that V. really *is* Stencil's
mother? (I don't remember if this same question was answered the
first time around, when posed by Lot64--and sent to me some months ago
when I joined this list on a motherquest. Lot64 cited some closing
graphs that supported the same idea, but we're not even close to those
yet.) The images here in Chap. 5 may bolster the V.-as-mother
interpretation, but is it possible to be definitive about such a thing
at this point in our reading?
7. General question: Why the cut and contrast between the Nueva York
bits and the Malta bits: the arch-Brit colonial spyjinks and the
proto-American jazz-y street-y org-y?
Enough. Somebody else.
Chris
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list