edu.bashing

[Henry M]

When someone speaks/writes something and in no way suggests "quotes," 
then we can only assume that the voice is theirs. If that voice 
doesn't suggest more than a bookish familiarity with 
T.C. MITS (The Celebrated Man (uh-oh) In The Street), then yes, 
that Person, not some movement that someone else may decide that that 
person represents, is out of touch. 

Of Course there are acamdemics, that are in touch and have 
comparatively normal acquantiances. The general should 
Never be applied to the individual instance without 
evidence that the individual does, if fact, conform to the general.

H

DCNY Forever!


On  4 Nov 96 at 9:49, davemarc wrote:

> What sense is there for a guy who feels unjustly stereotyped by Feminists to
> simply mirror what offends him?  What sense is there for someone on
> this list who feels that an intellectual argument is "out of touch"
> to attack its proponent instead of the argument itself as "out of
> touch"?

Keep Cool, but care. -- TRP
http://www.nicom.com/~gravity