GRGR1 - Giant Adenoid
Wolfe, Skip
crw4 at NIP1.EM.CDC.GOV
Tue Oct 1 13:23:00 CDT 1996
>But I think there's a deeper level of difficulty and that resides in
>TRP's textual innovations, which are arguably more radical than those
>of _Ulysses_ . . . Undoubtedly the history of 20th Century
fiction has been about
>breaking down these preconceptions, but TRP takes it further - I
>believe MUCH further - than anyone else. We're not used to reading
>texts that take this form, therefore we find _GR_ difficult.
>Craig Clark
I second everything Craig says. In addition, there's Pynchon's habit of
tossing the reader into the middle of a scene without a key, so to speak,
explaining where (s)he is or why. This can be disconcerting to first-time
readers. One gets used to it, but I think lots of readers give up before
that can happen -- at least the readers I've tried to steer his way.
Interestingly, I don't think Pynchon engages in obfuscation for its own sake
(something I don't think we can say of all contemporary writers). On the
other hand, I think he tries to be as clear as possible, given what he's
trying to do. He could easily drop a name -- Kekule, say -- and leave it to
the reader to figure out why it's there; but he will often spend whole pages
giving details on references and explaining how they relate to the passage
where they're inserted. O-or is he just giving us more chaos to try to make
order out of . . .
Skip
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list