Mason & Dixon

[Steven Maas (CUTR)]

On Mon, 21 Oct 1996 WillL at fieldschool.com wrote:

> up the sales charts")..  The article explained his continued significance by
> referring to the Pynchon "acolytes" 

This Post explanation strikes me as extremely lacking in depth and
understanding, rather like explaining that chemical processes are
significant because chemists study them. 

> and comparing them (us?) to "Kennedy assasination buffs."

So the Post thinks those of us who admire Pynchon's work are akin to
single-issue "buffs"?  How strange.

> Can't wait for those ripped bodices.

Yes indeed. Sounds like a typical book by the master, I can't wait. 
Thanks for the update.