Heidegger, Nixon, Husserl, Corey (was Re: What?)

[hankhank at ccwf.cc.utexas.edu]

On Thu, 5 Sep 1996 LBernier at tribune.com wrote:
>      
>      Jean, raising a big glass of hefe-weizen in hopes we're not going to 
>      have another go-round of Heidegger, wha? ;-)

Yes. I've been wondering why that endless thread connecting Pynchon to the 
continental tradition in philosophy just goes on & on & on, year after year.

Why can we *never*, even briefly, touch issues marginalized on the p-list, 
such as _GR_'s relation to math, or physics, or ballistics, or chemistry?

Heikki