Longitude
Bruce Appelbaum
Bruce_Appelbaum at chemsystems.com
Thu Apr 10 13:40:23 CDT 1997
As I said in my other response, the different units were developed for
different applications. The metric system, developed in the late
1700s or 1800s I believe, was developed in order to have a single
consistent set of units. A kilometer is a kilometer, on land, sea, or
in space.
Other units, such as nautical miles, are often referred to as
"conventional units" because of their traditional origin and use.
Note that the unit "kilometer" is really a meter with a prefix (kilo)
to indicate thousands. A centimeter, on the other hand is a meter
with a prefix (centi) to indicate hundredths. Similarly, a millimeter
is a meter with a prefix (milli) to indicate thousandths.
Metric prefixes are as follows:
1,000,000,000,000 10^12 tera
1,000,000,000 10^9 giga
1,000,000 10^6 mega
1,000 10^3 kilo
100 10^2 hecto
10 10^1 deka
0.1 10^-1 deci
0.01 10^-2 centi
0.001 10^-3 milli
0.000001 10^-6 micro
0.000000001 10^-9 nano
0.000000000001 10^-12 pico
0.000000000000001 10^-15 femto
And to confuse things even further, the metric system is being
replaced by the (sp?) Systeme Internationale (SI), which is pretty
much the metric system with a bunch of different names (for famous
scientists) for commonly used derived units (for instance, the unit of
pressure is the Pascal, the unit of energy is the Joule, the unit of
power is the Watt, the unit of force is the Newton).
As an engineer, I have to deal with varying sets of units in my work
-- some traditional (pounds, tons, gallons, feet, cubic feet, BTUs),
and some metric (kilograms, Joules, meters, cubic meters). Lots of
classroom time learning the units and how to do unit conversions
correctly from system to system.
Hope this helps
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Longitude
Author: Joe Varo <vjvaro at erie.net> at Internet
Date: 4/10/97 1:55 PM
Thanks to Murthy, Bruce and David for their clarifications of "nautical
miles".
So the reason for using nautical miles in air and sea travel is that by
these two modes of transportation you're more closely traveling along a
perfect sphere, whereas on land you have to deal with and traverse a more
irregular terrain?
Another question: is the nautical mile part of the metric system? Do
pilots from countries other than the US reckon their distances in
kilometers or nautical miles? Is the kilometer, for some reason, equally
accurate over both land and sea?
I realize that this has nothing to do with Pynchon...but who knows, it
might be useful for M&D.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list