Washington Post

[KENNETH HOUGHTON]

     Davemarc,
     
     Nah; yours was clearly a case of "fair use"; a sentence pulled from a 
     longer review of a longer piece, and clearly not taken out of context.
     
     Pulling an entire review, otoh, is just as clearly a violation of 
     "fair use."
     
     ken


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Washington Post
Author:  "davemarc" <davemarc at panix.com> at dbnaccip
Date:    4/28/97 2:11 PM


Sorry, Ken, if the quotation from your piece disturbed your peace.  
     
davemarc
----------
> From: KENNETH HOUGHTON <KENNETH_HOUGHTON at dbna.com> 
> To: pynchon-l at waste.org
> Subject: Re: Washington Post
> Date: Monday, April 28, 1997 12:35 PM 
> 
>      Washingtonpost.com Member Agreement: 
>      
>      1. Welcome to WashingtonPost.com. By using this Service, you agree 
to be 
>      bound by all of the terms of this Agreement and in the Discussion 
>      Guidelines....
>      
>      5.(a) You may not copy, reproduce, distribute, publish, enter into a
     
>      database, display, perform, modify, create derivative works, 
transmit, or 
>      in any way exploit any part of this Service, except that you may 
download 
>      material from this Service for your own personal, non-commercial use 
as 
>      follows: you may make one machine-readable copy and/or one print 
copy that 
>      is limited to occasional articles of personal interest only. Without
     
>      limiting the generality of the foregoing, _you may not distribute 
any part 
>      of this Service over any network, including a local area network_, 
nor sell 
>      or offer it for sale....
>      
>      (b) ...Without limiting the provisions of 5(a), neither you nor any 
third 
>      party should make use of the Service as we have designed it. 
>