Pynchon as historian?

Alan Westrope awestrop at crl.com
Sun Jul 6 11:07:48 CDT 1997


On Sat, 5 Jul 1997, Joaquin Stick <dmaus at email.unc.edu> wrote:
[much text snipped...]

>Not to beat a dead horse, but why the @$^%*#!! does this matter in the
>context of what the novel is doing? Authenticity in a novel that involves
>a story of a sado-masochistic German officer putting himself into a secret
>rocket to eventually blow up the theatre in which you are watching a movie
>of the book you've been reading. This IS NOT HISTORY. Pardon the shouting,
>but I simply don't expect Pynchon to be historically accurate to the
>painful minutiae, especially when his commentary is temporally dislocated
>BY DEFINITION. Should Kafka have studied the mind of the cockroach more?

At the risk of being thought a pedantic nuisance, I'll mention that an
eminent Russian-born entomologist has argued persuasively that the insect
in question is a beetle, not, as commonly thought, a cockroach.

Or so I am told by my friend Vivian d'Arc Blume, who asks me to append,
"...truth, whose mother is history, rival of time...," for reasons that
are unclear to me.

-- 
Alan Westrope      PGP public key:  http://www.crl.com/~awestrop
<awestrop at crl.com>                  also via keyservers & finger
<awestrop at nyx.net>
PGP 0xB8359639:    D6 89 74 03 77 C8 2D 43   7C CA 6D 57 29 25 69 23



More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list