Stoppard, Knotting-into, etc.
David Casseres
casseres at apple.com
Thu Mar 6 18:31:54 CST 1997
Craig B. (Oh, *that* Craig) sez
>My point was what?
Not sure, but I'll chime in about Stoppard, thanx for the opportunity. I
think he's a genius, and I still love best the first thing of his that I
ever read, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. I thought of it when I
recently saw Branagh's enormous, brilliant, stupid, wonderful,
infuriating film of Hamlet. One thing about that film is that if you put
together the longest possible edition of the play, as Branagh did, you
have an encyclopedic play. All those characters talking and talking for
four hours, by god they wind up talking about *everything* by the time
they're done & mostly dead. So there's that kind of similarity to an
encyclopedic novel like Gravity's Rainbow, Don Quixote, Moby-Dick, etc.
So what about Stoppard? Well at first I thought the trick of taking one
thread out of Hamlet, turning it into a modern play, and then weaving
Hamlet back into it was just that, a trick. Turned out, though, it was a
breathtakingly powerful thing to do, far beyond clever.
Like quite a few of Pynchon's formal maneuvers, e.g. (here it comes,
relevance!) the whole Anubis sequence, where Slothrop passes from one
world to another via an orgy that is the Dance of Death out of some
medieval bas-relief, during which he commits, for the first time in the
story, a strikingly sinful act that is also tinged with his first show of
actual love.... The effectiveness of it all has a lot to do with its
sheer complexity, its richness, a-and it's that better-than-a-trick trick
of knotting-into, isn't it, just like that Stoppard knotting the the R&G
thread back into itself, our time and Shakespeare's into each other --
Hamlet's entire talky encyclopedic universe, more things in Heaven and
Earth, Horatio, into itself. (That Horatio, though, he's the only one of
those talkers left alive at the end, with what's left of his philosophy.)
So just sitting here I can't think of another writer who shows such
mastery at knotting-into. Barth does it a bit but his knots tend to be
small, making swift transitions from one thing to another rather than
presenting a knotted maze for wandering through. Who else?
Cheers,
David
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list