sting operaton

[Tom Stanton]

At 12:00 PM 3/17/97 -0500, Henry Musikar wrote:
>This is why I have suggested some type of warning when someone joins 
>the list; more for the sake of the list than anything else.

A disclaimer?!...."as a member of p-list you will be flamed
with direct foul language, indirect foul language, and an assort-
ment of puns, double-entendres, and "bon-mots" that will have
several layers of meaning. You agree to discuss and/or flame in
kind when called on, to invoke your cultural, ethnic or religious 
biases on an as-needed basis (see 4.5.6. below), and to use
obscure and/or pornographic references when a standard insult
will do..."

>> FBI agent = "11" year old kid
>> Kid prompts adults for sexual related sites and/or comments
>> Adults = suckers
>> child porno charges against adults = kid + p-list + sex

I'm with davemarc here. While I doubt an 11 year old is really capable
of understanding TRP fully, I will give him/her/it credit for trying at least,
and see no reason why the whole sick discussion couldn't be carried
on with him. If he is a narc or stoolie, then the thought police can do their
worst. If someone is foolish enough to solicit favors from the alleged
youth, IMHO they have it coming.

but moderating