Frivolous literary note
MASCARO at humnet.ucla.edu
MASCARO at humnet.ucla.edu
Thu May 15 21:44:49 CDT 1997
Just to make things more slippery:
I was taught that a slippery slope argument is one that tries to fix a point on a continuum
where no clear lines of demarcartion exist. For example, the concept of *life* is a slippery
slope argument because no one can say where *life* begins. The Catholic church holds
that at the moment of conception a fetus is a moral being. Most scientists would reject
this claim. There's no objective authority to determine where on the continuum cell
duplication turns into a human being. *Race* is a similar slippery slope according to this
way of thinking--there's no objective measurement that can determine a person's *race*
because all *races* shade into each other w/ no boundaries. The last effort to find such an
objective criterion for race was I think an anthropologist named Carlton Coon at U. of
Pennsylvania in the 1920s. Coon argued that certain *mongoloid races* possessed a fifth
cusp on a molar. His data were rejected and he censured by the rest of the
anthropological community.
These examples don't seem to fit your definition though, jimmy. What would you call
them? I make no claim to authority here; just some background in rhetoric andf years of
dealing w/ faulty reasoning in student (and professional) writing.
Some of your examples, onthe other hand, seem to fit other fallacies much more clearly.
>1."We have to stop the tuition increase! The next thing you know, they'll
>be charging $40,000 a semester!"
Isn't that just a non sequitur?
>
>4."We've got to stop them from banning pornography. Once they start banning
>one form of literature, they will never stop. Next thing you know, they
>will be burning all the books!"
Usn't that just a faulty generalization? In fact, most of your definition seems to fall
under faulty generaliztion. How is it different?
So, I liked your post a lot, but I'm still muddled. See? (5) You can never read a post on a
difficult topic without becoming hopelessly lost.
john m
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list