The Spoiler Protocol
KENNETH HOUGHTON
KENNETH_HOUGHTON at dbna.com
Mon May 19 13:56:06 CDT 1997
The easy thing to do is decide that "spoilers" that come in sections
that have been covered by the upcoming M&DM&D aren't spoilers -- no
matter that several of us won't be so far into the book as the group.
But that would still mean "spoiler" warnings into Winter, maybe even
to Advent.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: The Spoiler Protocol
Author: "davemarc" <davemarc at panix.com> at dbnaccip
Date: 5/19/97 2:22 PM
Doesn't the real issue boil down to deciding *when* to stop using the
official spoiler protocol? Judging from current posts, "now" is almost
certainly too soon. I'd think that the randomly chosen date of, oh I
dunno, June 16 might be more realistic. Does anyone want it to apply after
that date?
Doesn't mean that "spoiler warnings" and the like might not still be
welcome for real M&D biggies, like the moment when
davemarc
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list