Rags and Bones
KENNETH HOUGHTON
KENNETH_HOUGHTON at dbna.com
Tue May 20 11:39:43 CDT 1997
_De_oxy...; no implication of the twain is intended.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Rags and Bones
Author: Craig Bleakley <cgbleak at rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu> at dbnaccip
Date: 5/19/97 11:43 PM
Well, gee, it seems that a lot of the same sort of talk is used by
non-Pynchonites to describe us--or to dismiss TRP (especially the wowing and
excluding parts). And you know, I think it's those nasty French
philosophers who thought up that bogus critical language just to spite
Anglo-Saxons. Amazing that specialists should talk in specialized language.
Good thing doctors, physicists, and computer geeks don't start coining their
own terms for complex phenomena, or we'll all be in the soup.
Dioxyribonucleic acid? Why not just "gene stuff"?
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list