Blicero's blundering babies (possible M&D spoiler)

[John D. Atchison]

At 03:54 PM 5/23/97 -0400, you wrote:
>Sojourner's point about the wording of John Atchison's post (that it
>doesn't specify where Tiffany and Jason are supposed to be the #1 names) is
>well-taken. 
>
>But Sojourner is mistaken in calling Atchison's post "irrelevant."  Perhaps
>Sojourner hasn't been reading the posts on the P-list over the past few
>days that have to do with Mason & Dixon.  Analysis of the names Tiffany and
>Jason is relevant to that discussion.  I guess if Atchison's heading had
>stated M&D 699 there might have been less confusion.
>
>davemarc
>
>A big Right you Are Davemarc and a tip o' the Atchison hat to you. I will
endeavor to be more specific in future contributions to what I find,
overall, is a fine list, with interesting and erudite contributors. Thanx
for the instruct.