The Embattled Keith Strikes Back!
Brecher_Keith/mskcc_Neurology at mskmail.mskcc.org
Brecher_Keith/mskcc_Neurology at mskmail.mskcc.org
Tue Sep 9 22:27:15 CDT 1997
Item Subject: Re: TWILIGHT OF THE IDOL(SMASHER)
Having been perhaps rightfully accused of waffling on precise details
about why I hate that overstuffed masterpiece MASON & DIXON, I first
thought of providing specific quotations and page references to Red
Hat's sacred texts, but the mere thought of lifting the weighty covers
of Ruggle's latest masterwork, seemingly heavier even than the fifty
pound lead covers of William Vollmann's GRAVE OF LOST STORIES, made me
too tired. Those requiring details should send me an SASE and I'll
send you back a faux-Paolizzi sculpture containing them.
What TRP did really well in V, CL49, and, magnificently, in GR is imply
mind-bending revelations which he, of course, never delivered on, but
somehow made appear genuine. Magic, get it? The classic example is the
literal crying of lot 49 in CL49. The ending is understated and all the
more breathtaking for that and, though not the first, is the archetypal
instance of this kind of sleight of hand in TRP's fiction. Of course, TRP
stops at the very threshold of revelation, incidentally making the reader
feel just like Oedipa as she contemplates San Narciso for the first time,
because what could he possibly reveal? Spielberg tried this in the
original CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND and everybody insisted that he
actually show the inside of the mother ship and when They released the
"special edition" of CLOSE ENCOUNTERS it was a huge let down and everybody
wished they'd stayed home and read GR instead.
The apotheosis of TRP's missed message motif occurs where else but in GR
and there are many instances; the most salient are the Kirghiz light
episode and Slothrop's missed revelation at Test Stand VII. I sure don't
know how the old Pynchon made anybody believe he was privy to truths his
bumbling, sweet characters and his brilliant, gimlet-eyed readers would
ever be on the verge of deciphering, but considering the astounding
intellects on this list, somebody out there must know.
On the basis of VINELAND and M&D, it seems that TRP has lost his magic
powers. I'm not saying that Pynchon is an aberration as a novelist, which
seems naive. I think it's more akin to early Dylan and late Dylan. There
seems little doubt that sometime in the 1970's, something happened to the
Good Bob, maybe too much pot smoking, so that he became the Bad Bob of the
80's and 90's (except for OH MERCY). I don't know what the hell TRP was
doing with himself between GR and VINELAND, but if M&D is what it was, he
should have been smoking more dope.
TRP's disappearing act made sense when he was writing true masterworks
like GR, but now that he's publishing crap like VINELAND and M&D, he might
as well come out and do Jay Leno. The only real conspiracy surrounding M&D
is the nauseating publicity that surrounded its release. The leaked opening
sentence and riven-in-stone April release date played along nicely with
TRP's mysterious absence so that great things were implied, namely, the
Idol, weary of his wisdom, descending alone from his mountain, encountering
no one, and dropping his latest load on the masses. Thanks Pynch.
[I think Melanie Jackson is to blame in some way. Isn't she Rick Moody
and Matt Ruff's agent? Didn't TRP say something good about Matt Ruff? And
didn't Rick Moody say plenty of good stuff about M&D. Talk about lead
plates buried in the earth and something moving Westward, what about the
Melanie Jackson conspiracy?]
The awesome intellect of the man behind the curtain, said by Chris to be
very much intact, does not seem any more awesome or encyclopedic in M&D
than, say, Wilbur Smith or James Michener. It's hardly a great ride. If GR
is Space Mountain, M&D is The People Mover.
What's really so bad about M&D? Compare the Poor Richard stuff in GR to
the Benjamin Franklin stuff in M&D. And, somebody please explain to me
what's so goddamn brilliant and meaningful about the George Washington
episode. Those horrible hemp jokes with Washington punning on pot and joint
cannot be justified even in a masterpiece like M&D. And George and Martha's
song. Man, does that ever suck. Whatever happened to the complex songs and
poem parodies of GR. They've become "I'm a Cop," I guess. Mentioning
FINNEGAN'S WAKE, Chris, is apt. GR is the equal of ULYSSES, but M&D is not
FINNEGAN'S WAKE. More like STEPHEN HERO.
Yes, less densely embedded. More subtle? No. TRP tries his usual mock
revelations, but they don't come off in M&D. A specific instance? Dixon's
collier brig experience. Another? The Jesuit and EIC conspiracies. The mood
is elegaic. Sure is, though senile might be a better word.
I think you're wrong, Chris, that TRP is writing a different kind of
book. Despite the stiff eighteenth-century prose, he's re-writing his old
stuff--same bumbling, good natured characters, same monolithic, evil
corporate entities, same lousy puns, same fake revelations, same quirks of
dialogue, same penchant for the mock-musical. The problem is that he does
it badly and the crappy songs, awful dialogue, and flimsy conspiracies
unfortunately make something of a mockery of GR, CL49, and V.
Which isn't to say that TRP should stop re-writing the same novel. J.G.
Ballard's been doing that for thirty years, and he keeps getting better and
better. So, place the heavy truths of M&D aside for a night or two, and
read a really worthy book like COCAINE NIGHTS that will never make the best
seller list, and certainly won't get a front page review in NYTBR, but is
the novel M&D should have been but wasn't.
_
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list