MDMD(Part1) possible style explanation...?

[Vaska Tumir]

Henry Kingman writes: 
>You write beautifully, Vaska, but I'm not buying it. Actually, I *loved*
>that post about the novel being more *linear* H^H^H^ than Pynchon's
>other stuff... better than a Hostess cup-cake. My own redoublings
>reflect my distractions, inability to properly use a bookmark and
>paucity of time for the damned thing, and not Pynchon putting any
>particular *form follows content* spin on things, is my guess. 

Okay, okay!  I said "could be".  Seriously though: lemme reread the thing
first and then decide what saving grace, if any, there is for some of the
muddling and length excessive.  [Rushdie's _Midnight's Children_, I always
thought, could have done with a less indulgent editor, so I'm open to that
interpretation, too.]

Vaska