GRGR (15): Good & Evil (was Enzian...)

[Paul Mackin]

On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Michael Perez wrote:

> rj wrote:
> "Yes, these are questions the text leaves the reader with. Unanswered
> questions. Or, relativism and ambiguity accrue because there are too
> many answers, too many possibilities, crowding in on top of one
> another, each one depending on context and perspective for its local
> 'truth.' [snip]'Good' and 'evil'? Yeah, right. Not in this Text, fella.
> The only moral compass here is the one in the reader's hand: 'There is
> time, if you need the comfort, to touch the person next to you, or to
> reach between your own cold legs . . . '"
> 
> Exactly.  This is sort of what I getting at since the beginning of this
> wonderfully mutant thread.

Hard to keep one's moral compass from twirling incessantly.

			p.