good faith

[rj]

Alas, too little. And too late. (And too many lies.)

*****

> Subject: 
>          Re: good faith
>    Date: 
>          Fri, 17 Dec 1999 01:39:09 EST
>   From: 
>          DudiousMax at aol.com
>      To: 
>          rjackson at mail.usyd.edu.au
> 
> 
> Dude,
>                 I gotta tellya, and you'll notice this is off-list, that if 
> you're addressing me, you have no reason to.  I've been lurking, and with the 
> exception of commenting on what I took to be Jody Porter's joke, I haven't 
> posted hardly at all since the summer.  Anybody who uses Yo isn't necessarily 
> me.  Truth to tell, I find in the list a lot of negative, time consuming, 
> ego-struggles into which I'd rather not be drawn.  I can't help but observe 
> that you are quick to take insult, to counter-escalate, and to be the center 
> of disproportionate number of these disputes.  If you don't believe me, check 
> the archives.  All I can offer is a word of advice---chill.  And that advice 
> is in good faith.
>                 Charles Hollander 


*****

For newcomers and others --

You might like to type "half name" (in double inverted commas) into the
p-list archive search engine (at http://waste.org/mail/) and see if you
can sort out the sycophants from the personas. It isn't hard. (Apologies
to cjhurtt who is neither of these. Neither, of course, now, am I.) 

Now, what was the name of that critic who wrote that article which kept
getting spammed across the aether here for months and months? I know.
I'll just type "magic eye" (double inverted commas again) into that same
search engine.

"delores haze" and "ian scuffling" might turn you up some interesting
"coincidences" also, I'd say.

Just the type of board game I'm good at. But Pynchon it ain't.

hohoho