GRGR(14)-Geen Drugs
David Morris
fqmorris at hotmail.com
Tue Nov 16 11:44:33 CST 1999
>From the Vaults of Erowid Newslatter:
http://www.erowid.org/
U.S. Cancels Patent on Sacred Ayahuasca Plant
Environmental News Service
November 5, 1999
WASHINGTON, DC, November 5, 1999 (ENS) - Indigenous peoples from nine South
American countries won a precedent-setting victory Thursday, as the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) canceled the patent issued to a U.S.
citizen for the ayahuasca vine.
The plant, Banisteriopsis caapi, is native to the Amazonian rainforest.
Thousands of indigenous people of the region use it in sacred religious and
healing ceremonies, as part of their traditional religions.
The PTO's decision came in response to a request for re-examination of the
patent filed with the PTO in March by the Coordinating Body for the
Indigenous Organizations of the Amazon Basin (COICA), the Amazon Alliance
for Indigenous and Traditional Peoples, and lawyers at the Center for
International Environmental Law (CIEL).
"Our Shamans and Elders were greatly troubled by this patent. Now they are
celebrating. This is an historic day for indigenous peoples everywhere,"
says Antonio Jacanamijoy, general coordinator of COICA.
Ayahuasca (Banisteriopsis caapi)
(Photo courtesy Ayahuasca Home Page)
According to David Rothschild, director of the Amazon Alliance, "Ayahuasca
is used in sacred indigenous ceremonies throughout the Amazon. This patent
never should have been issued in the first place."
The PTO based its rejection of the patent on the fact that publications
describing Banisteriopsis caapi were "known and available" prior to the
filing of the patent application. According to U.S. patent law, no invention
can be patented if described in printed publications more than one year
prior to the date of the patent application.
William Anderson, director of the University of Michigan Herbarium, said
that the PTO needs to improve its procedures for researching applications.
CIEL lawyer David Downes said, "While we are pleased that the PTO has
cancelled this flawed patent, we are concerned that the PTO still has not
dealt with the flaws in its policies that made it possible for someone to
patent this plant in the first place." He explained that "the PTO needs to
change its rules to prevent future patent claims based on the traditional
knowledge and use of a plant by indigenous peoples."
He also argued that "the PTO should face the issue head-on of whether it is
ethical for patent applicants to claim private rights over a plant or
knowledge that is sacred to a cultural or ethnic group."
In a separate proceeding at the PTO, the three groups have called for
changes in PTO rules. They argue that the PTO should require that patent
applicants identify all biological resources and traditional knowledge that
they used in developing the claimed invention. Applicants should also
disclose the geographical origin, and provide evidence that the source
country and indigenous community consented to its use.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list