Gottfried & Blicero, Nietzsche & Pynchon

[Stacy Borah]

A little bit of both, actually.  Sometimes, what someone saw in my writings 
jogged my memory of actually writing AND intending what they had 
interpreted.  Other times, they made better sense than my interpretations, 
so I agreed and said that was what I had intended.


>From: Paul Mackin <pmackin at clark.net>
>To: pynchon-l at waste.org
>Subject: Re: Gottfried & Blicero, Nietzsche & Pynchon
>Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:17:18 +0000 (GMT)
>
>
>
>On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Stacy Borah wrote:
>
> > I wrote many things on acid that made sense at the time,
> > but afterward -- well, the meanings eluded me until someone else pointed
> > them out.  And, I think that may be what Pynchon was referring to in the
> > Jules Siegel article (which is where I saw it).
>
>
>The "someone else" was able to derive MEANING from what you had written
>but it was THEIR meaning--or are you saying they actually helped you to
>remember what YOUR meaning has been--so that YOUR meaning was not
>permanently lost? (the latter would be somewhat like pyschoanalysis it
>might be said)
>
>			P.
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com