Theatre/Theater. The Text Machine Gets on the Stage...
Thomas Colin
thomas_colin at hotmail.com
Mon Feb 28 21:09:42 CST 2000
What follows is not directly about the theatre/theater problem, but on
theatre and theatricality in general, in GR.
Interestingly enough, the first occurrence on p3 ("it's all theatre") is
a metaphor *in presentia,* that is explicitly emphasised through a syntactic
link which relates usually differentiated modes of consciousness, and
bridges the gap between the real and the imaginary, reality and its staging
into a textual form. In a way, it erases the notion of an extralinguistic
reality, independent from any act of perception. So what we have from the
beginning is an altered perception, a dream, where the real is put at a
distance and de-naturalized : "it will be a spectacle."
If the metaphor is in presentia and the spectacle presented as a
virtually programmatic statement, is it still a metaphor? In the end it
seems to compel the reader to reconsider his/her notions of such dualities s
metaphorical and literal meanings, image and object (this is interesting
when we come to the cinematic simulation), word and referent (through the
signifier/signified filter), and also voice and subject, that is the idea
that a speech, as in the theatre, necessarily comes from some actor on
stage. This is radically thrown into question in GR.
So from here we have a theatre problematics which is a problematics of
reversibility : with on the one hand the real perceived as theatre, and on
the other hand theatre perceived as the real. Thus lain "ass backwards," we
can artificially divide theatracility in GR into two categories: mentions
of theatre (and cinema), and use of the theatrical and cinematic form.
Through the mentions of theatre, generally occurring at a moment of
revelation, the narrative voice takes on a hermeneutic position that
redoubles that of the reader, as decipherer of a real which his new lucidity
defines as veiled : a "puppet stage" (152). The real is then artificial
within the fictional text, and the true real (the Real, the Text) is always
underneath, or beyond, at several remotes. "Their" power is then a power of
alienation and illusion, quiet reminiscent of Debord's Society of the
Spectacle. By confusiong signs and phenomena, the society of the spectacle
(that is basically, the world we live in, folks) manages to invalidate both
: signs are fetichized and the real is as malleable as a text of fiction :
"La realite objective est presente des deux cotes. Chaque notions ainsi
fixee n'a pour fond que son passage dans l'oppose : la realite surgit dans
le spectacle, et le spectacle est reel. (Objective reality is present on
both sides. The end of each notion thus defined is to pass over to the
opposite side : reality looms up from the spectacle, and the spectacle is
real.)
Thing is: once we get a Real, an a Text (the Rocket? asks Enzian), it
could mean that the real, and the text of GR are only staging, performances
of It. This staging being redoubled by the performance and the staging of
the reading-process, another interpretative layer, another filtering lens.
Of course the Text cannot be read (just like God's intention in the Bible is
subject to endless interpretation for the Puritan). Thus paranoia as an
obscessive-compulsive struggle against the undeterminacy of all things, at
all levels. In the end the most stable entity is the reading conscience (and
again, not always), as stage director of an all-englobing stage. This is
where theatre no longer as mention, but as use (almost strategic use) comes
up. This stage is the dimension where "theatre might be the reading of a
book, its writing in operation." (Mallarme via Julia Kristeva in "Word
Dialogue, and Novel, *Desire in Language* Columbia UP).
So what about the "theatre" as deceptive acting and the "theater" as
active recognition? hu? well... dunno.
This, one more time, was a really quick overview. So questions, comments,
insults, bashings, welcome...
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list