pynchon-l-digest V2 #1064

[rj]

fb
> As for needing to be an "expert" in order to 
> comment such that at least one on the list feels secure that he is receiving 
> the facts(?), truth(?), well send in your credentials. Make it a two part 
> message at least, as your pronunciamentos have covered so many subjects that 
> one sheet certainly wouldn't do, you smug arrogant elitist probably damn 
> Yankee son of a bitch.  

Ironically, the labels you apply here are possibly quite apt, though it
seems that you might have mistaken the identity of the comment's
perpetrator.

best
rj <rjackson at mail.usyd.edu.au>

(*Not*, and I mean *NOT*, rjackson <slothrop666 at yahoo.com>)