A substantial group reading of V.

[Muchasmasgracias at cs.com]

I'm fascinated by the thought that if this bitmap crap turns out to last a 
long time, then 500 years from now scholars may be combing through all this 
p-list bickering in their search for pearls of Pynchonian wisdom.


pmackin at clark.net writes:

 The p-list is just text generating more text (as is text's wont). As
 rj likes to remind us text will be different upon each reading by each 
 individual reader.  So if the text-that-is-the p-list  can be said to be
 good or bad, better or worse than it used to be, this can be so only in
 relation to a particular reader.