GRGR(31): Low Frequency

Jeremy Osner jeremy at xyris.com
Mon Jul 10 14:30:32 CDT 2000


Paul Mackin wrote:

> I suspect that a 28 km wave would represent a low enough frequency that
> the radio waves would not be absorbed too much by the sea water.

B-but does the submarine then need a 9-mile long antenna? How does that work?







More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list