GRGR(24): Tchitcherine, Wimpe, Marxism, and you

[one million billionth of a millisecond on a sunday morning]

Paul Mackin writes:
>Well, except for a slight problem, I would have said Vasclav was merely
>alluding to dialectical materialist thinking under which any
>intentionality  behind an historically significant act (that which might
>occupy 'the time between' and could be pure or impure) is
>irrelevant.  Only the significant action itself (say, the blowing up of
>the bridge that saved the battalion) has meaning. 

What makes acts historically significant?




Josh
blissfully ignorant of most political philosophy

-- 
josh blog: http://www.public.iastate.edu/~kortbein/blog/
      tdr: http://www.public.iastate.edu/~kortbein/tdr/