VV(14) - The Creative & The Receptive
David Morris
fqmorris at hotmail.com
Fri Apr 20 10:18:09 CDT 2001
------
------ Ch'ien, The Creative Heaven, Sky
------
Attribute: Strength, creativity
Animal: horse
Body: head
Family: father
Direction: Northwest
-- --
-- -- K'un, The Receptive Earth
-- --
Attribute: Docility, receptivity
Animal: ox
Body: belly
Family: mother
Direction: Southwest
1. Ch'ien / The Creative
-----
----- above Ch'ien The Creative, Heaven
-----
-----
----- below Ch'ien The Creative, Heaven
-----
2. K'un / The Receptive
-- --
-- -- above K'un The Receptive, Earth
-- --
-- --
-- -- below K'un The Receptive, Earth
-- --
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond/index1.html
This site demonstrates the existence of a template we humans use to create
maps to aid us to identify, and re-identify, the meaningful from the
meaningless. This demonstration is done through a usable and detailed
exposition of the Book of Changes (I Ching), traditionally an ancient
Chinese method of predicting, as well as summarizing the more
'scientific'-biased maps including Mathematics, the MBTI®, and Physics; all
of which use dichotomy (pairs of extremes e.g. yin/yang, hot/cold,
firm/soft, wave/particle) as a method of mapping.
Whenever we make maps of reality, usually for the purpose of prediction, we
often fail to recognise that the maps are metaphors for how 'in here'
interprets 'out there'. This is the case not only for the esoteric maps
(e.g. The I Ching, Astrology) but also for the scientific maps (e.g.
Mathematics, Physics). I have discovered that underneath all of these maps
is a neurologically-determined template which allows one to easily make
analogies and create metaphors; it is a template of meaning that appears to
be shared by all of these categorisation systems. Simply put, all maps of
reality are metaphors for the way the brain categorises objects (wholes,
parts) and relationships (static, dynamic), and the template emerges from
this process.
In the process of evolution there appears to be a transition from reactive,
chance processes to proactive, determined processes. The change is due to
the internalisation of a map of the context in which one is evolving; the
map enables a lifeform to predict and so intergrate fully with the context.
The price for this map is that as we develop faster so we become more
dependent on the map; the map becomes the territory and we live through
metaphors (i.e. the map) that we often take too literally. This development
process reflects the transition from the use of metonymy (part-for-whole
identifications, LOCAL emphasis) to metaphor (created maps, GENERAL
emphasis) and under all of this is a METHODOLOGY that our brains use to
establish meaning and this methodology is based on the use of layering
dichotomies.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list