lit eco white
Jane Sweet
lycidas2 at earthlink.net
Sun Apr 29 15:32:43 CDT 2001
>
> 6.This kind of degenerative cycle is what Eddins
> calls, in language which echoes cybernetics, "modes
> of slippage inherent in the noetic distortions of
> gnosticism [which] are peculiarly relevant to the
> metaphysical force fields of Pynchon's cosmos: the
> instability of the elite-preterite dichotomy and the
> distinction between secular and religious
> constructs" (23). In other words, Brock and Frenesi
> and those that he, then she, betrays are caught in the
> logic of ecological runaway, what Joseph Slade
> Thomas Pynchon 125) has called "excluded
> middles and bad shit" in reference to the plight of
> Oedipa Maas in The Crying of Lot 49: under the
> Reagan-Bush version of the Entrepreneurial New
> World Order, you must either become a pawn of the
> new gnostic elite or sink more deeply into
> preterition. And if you want to fight back, you must
> also become like the gnostic elite: you must split the
> mental/cultural/social/natural ecosystem for the sake
> of power, to switch roles from Oppressed to
> Oppressor so that the original split in the human
> ecology escalates in what Bateson called the
> Romano-Palestinian System.4 This is the koan with
> which many of Pynchon's worthy characters are
> presented.
>
> In other words epistemological and ecological error
> are identical with the modernist paradigm and its
> industrial project. The literary-ecological
> correction of the error in Vineland is arguably an
> extension of what Eddins calls "Orphic Naturalism"
> in Gravity's Rainbow: "a counterreligion to the
> worship of mechanism, power, and--
> ultimately--death" (5).
>
> This attribution of "mind" to "man" and
> materiality to "nature," characteristic of the
> Cartesian dualism of res cogitans as the human
> cogito and res extensa as the objective world, and
> further expressed in the masculine subject of power
> dominating "mother" nature, as it is in the
> entrepreneurial persona who owns the world as his
> "real estate," is arguably one of the principal targets
> of the literary ecological critique. Thus literary
> ecology embodies a synthesis of ecosocialist, deep
> ecological and ecofeminist concerns, but
> approaches them in terms of a postmodern
> ecological rubric which steps past the traditional
> either-or of the Oppressor and Oppressed, Elite and
> Preterite, Sacred and Secular, as deftly as Pynchon's
> Ninjette DL (Darryl Louise Chastain) slips past
> Brock Vond's guards.
> This is not unlike the feeling which drew the
> "flower children" back to nature in the 1960's,
> articulated and sustained in the writings of Edward
> Abbey and Annie Dillard. Romantic writing was in
> direct response to the urbanization and
> mechanization of life effected by the Industrial
> Revolution, just as popular ecology is largely a
> response to what Mumford called the Megamachine
> of modern technology, economy, society and polity
> which has destroyed and displaced much of the
> human lifeworld, of "Earth House Hold" in the
> words of poet Gary Snyder. An incipient ecological
> sensibility is also evident in the "persistent
> modernist nostalgia for vanished axiological
> foundations in the midst of vividly experienced
> anomie" which Eddins finds in the work of Pynchon
> and is perhaps most vividly expressed, virtually in
> ecological dimension, by T.S. Eliot in The Waste
> Land. Here images of a fouled, poisoned
> environment merge with those of human spiritual
> and physical demise--
>
> Unreal City,
> Under the brown fog of a winter dawn,
> A Crowd flowed over London Bridge, so many,
> I had not thought death had undone so many.
>
> A rat crept softly through the vegetation
> Dragging its slimy belly on the bank
> While I was fishing in the dull> canal
>
> The river sweats
> Oil and tar . . .
>
> --amidst a culture which is shattered but whose very
> shards inspire hope of renewal: "These fragments I
> have shored against my ruins." Additionally, the
> fusion of human imagination with nature's images, as
> well as the adamant leftist politics, characteristic of
> Magical Realism, for example in Gabriel Garcia
> Marquez's Autumn of the Patriarch, is arguably an
> important forebear, and Carlos Fuentes' recent
> Christopher Unborn I might well have included
> with Mile Zero and Vineland as an example of
> literary ecology, except for its problematic
> representation of gender. African literature is also a
> likely ancestor of the genre, for example Chinua
> Achebe's Things Fall Apart where the
> fragmentation of tribal society under the impact of
> European colonialism is explored, as it is in
> American literature by Peter Matthiessen, with
> regard to South American Indians, in another likely
> progenitor, At Play in the Fields of the Lord. Doris
> Lessing's Briefing for a Descent into Hell presents
> a profound fusion of the human mind with nature's,
> as her Golden Notebook reflects on feminist and
> socialist alternatives, both dimensions of which
> come together and are uplifted and transformed
> (Aufhebung) in her Canopus in Argos: Archives,
> especially Shikasta. Vonnegut's Breakfast of
> Champions and Galapagos should not be
> overlooked in the search for LitEcol ancestors and,
> particularly where Pynchon is concerned, I would
> look up from these printed artifacts and seriously
> review the adventures of Tweety and Sylvester
> Vineland 22).
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list