correcting typo RE: col49 2 pt2

David Morris fqmorris at hotmail.com
Fri Aug 10 10:03:41 CDT 2001


So even after all the references to LSD that Jim has provided from popular 
media prior to 1966, you still hold on to your unsubstantiated position that 
LSD was unknown to most people when COL was first published?  If so you are 
either blind or hard-headed or both.

BTW, I do think that Pynchon writes for his readers, at least in the sense 
that he expects the surface story to be understood.

David Morris

>From: Tim Strzechowski
>
>But does Pynchon write for his readers?  Does someone like Pynchon care
>if his topic of fiction has a broad appeal?  Of course not, David.  I
>think Pynchon "expected" some readers to get it, but figured most
>readers wouldn't. And the popularity of V. undoubtedly gave him enough
>literary status to get the necessary backing from a magazine.
>
>
>David Morris wrote:
>
> > Here's a question:  If the existence of LSD was not relatively common
> > knowledge at the time, then how could Pynchon (or the magazine editors) 
>have
> > expected the readers to have any idea what this reference to LSD meant?

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list