the "Slothropite heresy"

jbor jbor at bigpond.com
Sat Feb 3 17:12:51 CST 2001


----------
>From: <lycidas2 at earthlink.net>
>

> Yes, but he also thinking about a route Back.
>
>
> The path back is a no no.

I guess what I don't understand is why the "path back is a no no", as you
put it here. Slothrop, in contemplating the alternative possibilities that
were available at the time the New World was settled and comparing them to
the "cleared ... depolarized" space of "the Zone" immediately after the War
here, wonders if there is a "route back", by which I take it he means a
route back to that precise moment when the choice between a set or sets of
alternatives were available (as when the Founding Fathers were setting up
their colonies in the New World way back when), one such alternative being
W. Slothrop's compassionate and egalitarian model of Christianity: "without
elect, without preterite, without even nationality ot fuck it up. . . . "

best




More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list