IG Farben & French Shakespeare.1&2

[Dave Monroe]

There are problematic distinctions betwixt said
"muses," said "masters," "the  aesthetic," "the
political," at al., being made here, methinks.  And
I'd suggest that perhaps those Pynchonian texts,
perhaps moreso than most any others, problematize
precisely those distinctions.  Think, as I believe
Terrance has been, as I've been attempting to think,
that Romanticist love-death thing, liebestod, maybe
even that lustmord, whatever, for example, the
contexts, contingencies, and, esp., casualities
(fictional, actual, potential) thereof ...


--- Paul Mackin <paul.mackin at verizon.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 February 2001 12:47,  MalignD wrote:
> 
> > <<Yes, it seems  safe to say this was his primary
> goal, but his primary
> > goal does not  preclude these others. The two are
> in fact not incompatible,
> > but two sides of the same text.>>
> >
> > I would argue rather that one can't do both
> properly.
> 
> 
> As St. Matthew sez:
> 
> "No man can serve two masters; for either he will
> hate the one, and love the 
> other, or else he will hold to the one, and despise
> the other. Ye cannot 
> serve God and mammon."
> 
> A truth that has been challenged (lately by FBI
> spyster Hanssen) but never 
> overthrown.
> 
> 			P.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/