NP RE: Another Holocaust-denier Bites the Dust

[Paul Mackin]

A good and balanced bio of Lane it seems to me. I was a subscriber to The
National Guardian during this period and was good friends with one of its
chief writers. I remember reading Mark Lane's early pieces on the
assassination. He did a creditable enough job in pointing out problems with
the official investigation I guess. I was also a subscriber to Ramparts
Magazine and if Warren Hinkle took an instant dislike to and distrust of
Lane and I can certainly see why. I believe the conspirary theory developed
by Lane and others is quite beyond serious belief. It's not that I don't
think conspiracies happen. This just isn't one of them. IMHO.

Seems to me it would be good if the whole course of events could be thrashed
out on the p-list including the strange latter-day involvements of Lane. In
a way the topic is NP but in another way we all can appreciate I think it is
very much p-related.

                P.



. ----- Original Message -----
From: "jbor" <jbor at bigpond.com>
To: "Bill Blue" <peterredzinger at hotmail.com>; <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: NP RE: Another Holocaust-denier Bites the Dust


> Thanks. A bio here:
>
>     snip
>
>     When someone announces confidently that "conspiracy in the JFK
>     assassination is historical fact," as people like George Michael Evica
>     and Charles Drago have been doing for several years, their
>     pronouncements are meaningless.
>
> http://kenrahn.com/JFK/The_critics/Lane/Lanebio.html
>
> best
>
>
>
> on 7/21/01 10:50 AM, Bill Blue at peterredzinger at hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > www.alltheweb.com
> >
> >
> >> From: jbor
> > Anyone got any more info. on this guy and his
> >> conspiracy theories?
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> >
>
>