Mason and Dixon criticism

[Dave Monroe]

I think I already posted these recently, but, from the
"Pynchon and the Law" special issue of the Oklahoma
City University Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 3 (1999),
articles specifically on Mason and Dixon ... 

http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/lpop/etext/okla/fischer24.htm

http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/lpop/etext/okla/perez24.htm

http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/lpop/etext/okla/siegel24.htm

And I'm assuming your familiar with ...

Clerc, Charles.  Mason and Dixon and Pynchon.
   Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2000.   

Horvath, Brooke and Irving Malin, eds.
   Pynchon and Mason and Dixon.  Newark, DE:
   U of Delaware P, 2000.

Neither of which I've much more than flipped through
so far, but perhaps the bibliographies here might be
of some help?  I'll take a look soon as I get a
chance.  And while I'm at it ...

http://www.themodernword.com/pynchon/pynchon_m&d.htm

http://www.hyperarts.com/pynchon/mason-dixon/masondixon-f.html

http://www.swarthmore.edu/Humanities/pschmid1/essays/pynchon/mason.html

http://216.247.214.252/pynchon/masonmain.htm

Anyway, hope something there is of some help ...

--- Harry Graff Kimball <kimball at fas.harvard.edu>
wrote:
> Although there are numerous interesting reviews of
> Mason and Dixon, I have
> had difficulty finding any journal pieces focusing
> on the book in a "heavy"
> way.  Anyone have any leads on Mason and Dixon lit
> crit, esp. regarding use
> and role of history?  Thanks.
> 
> Harry Kimball
> kimball at fas.harvard.edu
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/