Subject/Objective Reality/Illusion
David Morris
fqmorris at hotmail.com
Thu Nov 22 14:06:11 CST 2001
http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/o/objectiv.htm
The word "objectivity" refers to the view that the truth of a thing is
independent from the observing subject. The notion of objectivity entails
that certain things exist independently from the mind, or that they are at
least in an external sphere. Objective truths are independent of human
wishes and beliefs. The notion of objectivity is especially relevant to the
status of our various ideas, and the question is to what extent objectivity
is possible for thought, and to what extent it is necessary.
In epistemology, the objectivist position is that truth independent of the
individual; this follows the correspondence theory of truth. However,
idealists use 'objectivity" to designate that existence in thought is the
only kind of real existence. In metaphysics, Plato identifies objectivity as
pertaining to the world of the forms. For Plato, the forms reside in a
separate world, which is invisible to our sense, although obtainable through
reason. Thus, Plato refers to real objects the "knowable forms" which
include the objective truths of justice, beauty, truth, and love.
Philosophers of the modern period concede the reality of the objective
realm, although argue that it is unattainable. This is so of Locke's account
of the a thing's substance, and Kant's view that our knowledge is restricted
to the phenomenal realm, with no direct access to things in themselves.
In this century, Richard Rorty distinguishes between two notions of
"objectivity." One involves the correspondence with what is out there, and
is supposedly discovered by an algorithm. This Rorty rejects as since we
have no idea how to perform this task. His second notion of "objective"
involves those considerations adopted by a consensus of rational
discussants. This, he believes, is the most objectivity we can hope for.
http://www.bomis.com/objectivity/
OBJECTIVITY
A journal of metaphysics,epistemology, and theory of value
informed by modern science
>From: <barbara100 at jps.net>
>But does that mean we shouldn't try? Try to read objectively? [...] It may
>not be possible, but I still think we should strive for objectivity.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list