feeding hungry people

[David Morris]

1.  "A" describes a _potential_ event as reason to change current food drops 
by the US to Afgans.

2.  "B" asserts that such an event "hasn't happened" as an acceptable 
argument against "A"'s indictment against the value of current food drops by 
the US to Afgans.

3.  "C" questions "B" about his knowledge against "A"'s hypothetical reason 
for devalueing current food drops by the US to Afgans.

Does this line seem a little stilted?  Can you ask "B" to prove against an 
hypothetical?  Maybe so, but to what end?

DM

>From: Kurt-Werner Pörtner
>MalignD at aol.com:
>
> > Describing something that hasn't happened then offering an excuse for 
>why no one will see it.
>How can you know? Have you been there? Do you have information others don't 
>have?

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp