Mulholland Drive

[Don Corathers]

For those who have seen Mulholland Drive, a question for discussion, which
we can pursue offline if this subject is too NP, although it might be a
pleasant diversion from the Current Topic.

Multiple choice: the geometric figure that best describes the plotline of
this film is:

a. A circle.
b. Two (or more) circles in parallel planes.
c. Two tangential circles.
d. A spiral.
e. A double helix.
f. None of the above.
g. All of the above.
h. Not dreamt of in our philosophy, Horatio.

With Lynch, there is usually a point in the experience when I ask myself
what I will call the Giles Goat-Boy Question, which goes: "Is he really
doing something here, or just fucking with me?" One of the virtues of
Mulholland Drive is that it never gives you a moment to doubt its sincerety.
That might come later, as you try to sort it out with your date over a beer.
By then it doesn't matter. What lingers after a dream is not the sense of
it, but the way it changed your brain chemistry while it was happening. And
the conviction that if you could only hold the whole thing in your head all
at once, it *would* make sense.

To Thomas's list of memorable scenes I would add the set piece in the office
of the young private detective, for which Mr. Lynch should receive a comic
violence patent.

Don Corathers







----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Eckhardt" <thomaseckhardt at yahoo.de>
To: "Dave Monroe" <davidmmonroe at yahoo.com>; "'Pynchon List'"
<pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 3:00 PM
Subject: Mulholland Drive


> David Monroe wrote, about "Mulholland Drive",
>
> > Convince me.
>
> I am afraid this can't be done. A work of art usually
> either works for you or it doesn't, and I think this
> is especially true for the movies. What I like about
> Lynch's best movies is that they fill me with a sense
> of wonder. He forces me by means of his craft to
> suspend my disbelief ("unwilling suspension of
> disbelief" anyone?) and enter a slightly parallel
> universe. These are cliches but, yes, I am thinking of
> "confounding expectations" and narratives resembling
> dreams - not totally incoherent but also not making
> complete sense to the waking mind. See also "Vertigo"
> and "Suspiria".
>
> And "MD" contains scenes of breathtaking beauty. The
> performance of Orbison's "Crying" in that mysterious
> nightclub, for example. The scene at first seems to be
> a rather heavy-handed approach to the perennial "what
> you see (or hear in this case) is just an illusion"
> topos. But this rational thought vanishes as we listen
> to this incredibly beautiful version of this song, a
> performance so immediate and overwhelming that the
> illusion, so to speak, takes on a reality of its own.
> Something similar happens in the audition scene.
>
> It is a trick very similar to that moment in "Blue
> Velvet" in which Dean Stockwell performs "In Dreams" -
> a scene which Greil Marcus once accurately described
> with the words: "Suddenly, for no apparent reason, the
> whole movie seems to implode." (quoted from memory) -
> which is one of my favourite movie scenes of all time.
>
>
> I could go on, but I still have some sightseeing and
> beachwalking left to do. I'll try to find the time to
> see "Waking Life" in the remaining few days. Thanks
> for the recommendation.
>
> Thomas
>
> __________________________________________________________________
>
> Es ist soweit: das Nokia Game beginnt. Sei bereit für das multimediale
Abenteuer. Melde dich bis zum 3. November bei
http://de.promotions.yahoo.com/info/nokiagame an!
>
>
>