filtering

[Marilyn Schneck]

>In a message dated 9/17/1 11:36:46 PM, you wrote:
>
><<When the 'event' evoked its first waste-based messages, I did create a
>filter to the whole list to avoid having to witness all of this ill will
>among the "group" - I look forward to this forum returning to its original
>purpose so I can tune back in without having my fingers in front of my eyes.
>
>Marilyn>>
>
>You're upset, Marilyn--is that what I'm to understand--that subscribers to
>this list are more taken with the 4,000 dead in New York than with the whys
>and wherefores of Reverend Cherrycoke?
>
>

I am not suggesting that the current events do not warrant discussion nor
in any way that the doings of the Reverend are 'more important' and should
take precedence - the point of my message - read carefully - is that I
don't like the ill will in the discussion - that people are telling each
other to fuck off, etc.  I do however look forward to better days. Until
then, ...