P's intentions? WAS Re: Walk this way
Phaedra Kelly
bluefreaky at hotmail.com
Fri Aug 9 08:56:44 CDT 2002
My vision of the text is text-as-fractal. You look at it as a whole, and
it's wonderfully complex. You focus on a particular part, and its
wonderfully complex. You focus on a particular part of that, and it's
wonderfully complex. And so on, and so on. And then, you switch back from
level to level. No center, no bottom, just an infinite complexity of
meanings that in some way that I can't begin to understand rebounds upon
itself. Oh, and did I mention that the fractal was moving? And that in
some small way, you, the observer, changes the fractal?
Actually, that's not a bad way of thinking about the world in general. Or
one's life. World-as-text, person-as-text. The only reality being that
corporations rule the world, that we have an idiot/mad man as president, and
that the planet's resources are being depleted at an alarming, and perhaps
fatal, rate.
phaedra
phaedra
>From: Doug Millison <pynchonoid at yahoo.com>
>To: pynchon-l at waste.org
>Subject: Re: P's intentions? WAS Re: Walk this way
>Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 19:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
>
>I couldn't agree more.
>
>
>--- Otto The idea of a "bottom" or "comprehensive
> > understanding" of a literary
> > text is something that is rejected by postmodernism
> > as a tool to study
> > cultural artefacts.
>
>
>=====
><www.pynchonoid.blogspot.com>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
>http://www.hotjobs.com
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list