MDDM Ch. 70 Scalping Lord Lepton
Bandwraith at aol.com
Bandwraith at aol.com
Tue Aug 20 21:40:49 CDT 2002
In a message dated 8/20/02 8:10:41 PM, rfiero at pophost.com writes:
from jbor:
<< >"... He was a very bad man. Even White People hated him." (681.1)
rfiero:
My reading certainly differs here. This is great humor on the
part of Catfish who is implying that "Whites are so bad that
it's unthinkable that a White could hate someone for badness
unless that person was supremely bad."
Ha, ha! that's good. I like your Catfish!
. . .
>>I think it is "meant" to be Lepton's Scalp, as well, but that
>could all be part of the staging, for the benefit of this
>particular audience. The scalping has occurred off stage. Even
>if it is Lepton's scalp, meeting up with M&D so soon after
>the deed, so far west of Castle Lepton is, at least, "cute."<<
rfiero:
"I don't believe that Pynchon is doing social darwinism here. Yes, it's
theater."
>. . .
>Clearly, the symbolism of a five-sided star on the Cheek-
>Piece ....
rfiero:
"The five-sided star in my opinion is just a trinket. It has no
symbolism or power other than what Mason invests in it. Mason
is a true klutz here to admonish Catfish to "pry it out." This
has to be the epitome of stupidity and is itself embarrassingly
funny -- "'The sign on it has Evil Powers,' Mason warns. 'You
should take a knife or something and pry it out.'"
Still chuckling over that one and apologies for my well-intentioned
differences."
None necessary. But come to think of it, many of Pynchon's
tropes border on being contrived, "klutzy" or even rube
goldberg-ish, probably something akin to the high magic/low
pun formula first articulated in Lot49. & another trademark
difference between him and some of the names being bandied
about here, of late. It is a territory he seems to insist on
staking out- sort of a magical hyper-realism- and imo, a
"poison pill" to those, like Millison, determined to fence him into
some sort of ideological high sierra.
So the question for me is: Is Mason's obsessively superstitious
reaction to the sterloop just his own- remember Wicks tried
to reason with him about this same topic back at Lepton
castle- or, is Pynchon using another klutzy trope to once
again undercut any of those possible "invisible connections,"
while at the same time tempting any of us inclined toward
high magic to step across the threshold?
regards
----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <owner-pynchon-l at waste.org>
Received: from rly-xj02.mx.aol.com (rly-xj02.mail.aol.com [172.20.116.39])
by air-xj03.mail.aol.com (v87.22) with ESMTP id MAILINXJ34-0820211041; Tue,
20 Aug 2002 21:10:41 -0400
Received: from waste.org (waste.org [209.173.204.2]) by rly-xj02.mx.aol.com
(v87.22) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXJ29-0820211024; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 21:10:24
2000
Received: from waste.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by waste.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id g7L18xJC028021
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Tue, >>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list