better version of Playboy Japan interview with TRP
David Morris
fqmorris at hotmail.com
Mon Jan 7 08:34:58 CST 2002
If Pynchon kept away from the press all those years out of a fear of
devaluing his writings, it seems that was a good strategy. Too bad he came
out of hiding. Pynchon might be only a symbol, not really there.
DM
>From: Doug Millison <millison at online-journalist.com>
>Here's a note from my friend Naoki and a more complete translation of the
>Playboy Japan interview.
>
>Most of The News Is Propaganda
>There Might Be No Bin Laden Ever Existed.
>
>[Text]
>
>Right now, New Yorkers constantly talk about whether they have already
>visited the WTC attack sites or not. Some went to see the ruins and others
>have not seen them yet. It is the trendy topic of the time. I think that it
>will take some time before I feel like visiting the site myself.
>
>Since the attacks, I stopped taking subways. That's the biggest change in
>my everyday life. I used to go everywhere riding the subways, but now I
>never take subways because I'm afraid of chemical weapons. There is a
>precedent of the sarin attacks in Tokyo and the causalities from the
>biological weapon called anthrax are spreading. I will not surprised if
>chemical weapons are used against us anytime soon.
>
>CNN is the media that reports on the terrorist attacks all the time. Since
>most of the Americans watch CNN, it is safe to say that all the news that
>ordinary people get is the same. But, the real danger is that people
>believe what they see on CNN is the news.
>
>For TV stations, a time like this offers the best opportunity to show us
>their originality. However, the anchorpersons on the TV just read the
>tele-prompter in a monotone voice, or repeat the sentences that are
>continuously fed from the earpieces hidden from us. They look like they
>are talking just to fill the empty airtime.
>
>There is an adjective, "affectless". The way those anchorpersons report is
>the best described as "affectless". It doesn't have a human touch and
>there is no power of emotion in their reporting. I don't like it. When I
>listen to them carefully, there is not much news. Most are propaganda.
>
>The terrorist attacks have changed the New York Times most. I used to wake
>up one hour early to buy the paper, but now it is not worth reading sitting
>down. I can go through all the pages of the paper before I sit down. There
>is little useful news in the Times. Most are propaganda.
>
>Although the news that there are antibiotics other than Cipro for treating
>anthrax infection is a little useful, useful news like that is becoming
>rare. The New York Times was usually the most reliable media for checking
>what happened in 20-30 years ago, but no more. Today, the Guardian of
>England is the most reliable newspaper that is read by the intellectuals of
>today. People read it on the Internet. I think the information from the
>White House also contains a lot of propaganda.
>
>The problem is the ordinary citizen cannot distinguish the news from the
>propaganda. Contrary to our belief, there is quite reliable news from
>Israel.
>
>In a time of war, information warfare is rather important and even those
>respected newspapers cannot be trusted. The founder of the Daily Mail,
>which was published 100 years ago in London said "News is something
>somebody wants to suppress. Everything else is propaganda."
>
>The information that the reporters can obtain easily is likely to be
>propaganda even when it comes from the White House.
>
>Bin Laden should be considered as a symbol. America always looks for an
>enemy. The country cannot feel O.K. without it. It has labeled Bin Laden as
>the bad guy who commanded the terrorist attacks from behind the scenes,
>only because we couldn't feel O.K. unless we made him. But I think Bin
>Laden is just somebody's rodeo clown.
>
>My thought has been always a little paranoid. But it is not only I who
>thinks like that. NSA is supposed to watch Bin Laden, but I think we are
>going to see a new layer after a layer like onionskins. I cannot help
>thinking it was not he alone responsible for the attacks. I have an
>impression that Bin Laden is just a front man.
>
>I wonder honestly if those photos of Bin Laden on TV and newspapers are the
>his real face. Right after the terrorist attacks, I remembered someone
>said" Come on, you want bin Laden? We'll give you 20 of him." Even if
>America kills a Bin Laden, there will be 19 more Bin Ladens. Even there is
>only one Bin Laden, there are many who want to succeed him.
>
>If you look at the matter from a different angle, Bin Laden should be
>considered as a symbol rather than as a human. It might be that no Bin
>Laden ever existed.
>
>I read this while I was surfing on the Internet. The most suitable
>punishment for Bin Laden is to perform a sex-change operation on him after
>catching him alive and taking him to a hospital. Then, we return him back
>to Afghanistan and make him understand how they abuse women there.
>
>We should not forget that many of Bin Laden's brothers were once the
>business partners of George Bush jr. in oil ventures. The doctor who
>always stood by Bin Laden was a member of the group who killed Sadat. There
>might be others who ran away from Egypt after the assassination in
>Afghanistan.
>
>People often mention that one of the reasons why they hate America is
>because she is rich. I can understand this well. When I see wealthy people,
>I feel anger instinctively from the bottom of my heart. It is natural for
>them to feel a hatred for wealthy America, as Afghanistan is the poorest
>country in the world. They just cannot help from hating her.
>
>It is not going to solve all the problems even if America stops supporting
>Israel. However, from the Arab perspective, Israel is the origin of all the
>wrongs.
>
>Finally, if I want to invest in stock aggressively now, I am going to
>invest in the tobacco industry. After the attacks, those who had quit
>smoking in the past has begun smoking tobacco again.
>
>(Interview and Text by Motokazu Ohno)
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list