re Re Brent's lament

[Paul Mackin]

Is resolving to ignore Doug really a very good idea?

In the first place ignoring him is impossible, in the same way it was
impossible to ignore Jules.

Secondly, do we really WANT the insults he unleashes on the p-list to go
unanswered. I would be willing to let the simple minded interpretations of the
books go unnoticed (though I haven't always followed this practice in the
past). But the bullying, often repeated charges that we are blind and derelict
in our obligation to world justice because we don't accept his positions
should NOT go unnoticed and unanswered.

To save labor we could take turns.

P.



David Morris wrote:

> I hereby resolve to turn on my <millison at online-journalist.com> filter.
> Terrance is right.  Give Doug a dose of his (unused) own medicine:  passive
> resistance.  (don't forget to also filter out his other personas)  Anything
> good I might miss will surely turn up in the echoes.
>
> DM
>
> >From: Doug Millison <millison at online-journalist.com>
> >
> >Perhaps you don't realize how funny it is to read posts from people like
> >you and Terrance, as you complain about people who focus their posts on me
> >even as you are doing precisely that.  Hilarious!
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com