next

[David Morris]

Sorry for my brusque reply.  My only defense is to reference my own 
innumerable past pleadings  for posts related to Pynchon's texts, if not for 
the book under years-long consideration.  I didn't mean to bite, not hard at 
least.  Nibble, nibble.

You're not Select?  Who toldya so?
Select is as Select does.
"Few" is also redundant in this context, dontcha think?

David Morris

>From: slothenvypride <slothenvypride7 at yahoo.com>
>
>That's fair.  I'll agree with you there.  But I think it's easy for lit 
>lovers to generate list after list of titles, and come up with all sorts of 
>ambitions, yet when it comes to producing the necessary grunt-work of 
>discussion, it can often fall on the shoulders of a select few.  I'm trying 
>to offer the select few some seniority here.  That's all.
>sep7 (myself not a part of the select few)
>  David Morris wrote:
>Pardon, but I'd like to call you on this presumption. Just look back to the 
>archives to see the participants of the previous three P-list group-reads 
>of GR, Vineland and V, going back at least four years with just these 
>three. This list has many more faithful participants than those of this 
>last book, so please back off a bit from such pronouncements, OK?

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com