SLSL Intro A Couple-Three Bonzos
MalignD at aol.com
MalignD at aol.com
Mon Nov 11 10:27:40 CST 2002
Responding to Charles Albert:
It's difficult to respond to you point by point because my argument isn't
that Pynchon isn't being ironic or obscurant; rather, that there's no
evidence or, in my reading, any real hint that that's his tone or that a wise
reader will need run the essay through a converter in order to find the
"real" meaning of what he's writing. And, I'm afraid I can't put Occam aside
without misleading you as to the way I think.
A couple of things. I think the Pynchon/Nabokov comparison can be pushed too
far. These are, finally, very different writers from different generations.
Nabokov is a displaced white Russian, very European in his sensibilities,
Pynchon nothing of the sort. And there are great differences between the
often convoluted, but highly controlled fictions of Nabokov and the far more
loose and rambling works of Pynchon. Nabokov was a middle-aged immigrant to
America who had, prior to that time, been writing in Russian; Pynchon, well,
not that. I of course think there are similarities as well and I find it
reasonable to think that Nabokov influenced Pynchon if only because they were
both at Cornell, Pynchon an aspiring writer, Nabokov by that time the author
of Lolita. But I think one can only point to instances of influence and
similarity where one finds them--note the individual case--and that it's
reckless to extrapolate broader similarities and influences from them with no
more basis.
<<Occam would suggest that he is speaking "generationally" - which seems out
of character for someone who seems so intent on distancing himself from any
such "crowd" >>
Not sure about Occam, but I don't find it out of character. I think of
Pynchon as part of a generation, or a group within a generation, a
particularly interesting one that includes Geoff Muldaur, Bob Dylan, Ken
Kesey, Robert Stone--one separated from the hippies that followed in some
large part by their intellectualism, even their attendance at college. Even
Dylan did some time at college. Their sensibility was rooted in cultural
history and was interested, even reverent, toward forebears--Woody Guthrie,
Robert Johnson, the Beats, etc. Rebellion was directed and polemical, as
opposed to what came later, where rebellion was in large part unintellectual,
mocking and dismissive. I think Pynchon in his few essays, but also in his
fiction, has tended to show himself as a "we,"--the hipster references,
Charlie Parker, Malcolm X, Wittgenstein, the whole intellectual hipster
catalog --as part of the generational group I'm talking about.
<<Does he have nothing good to say about a set of stories that at the very
least can be described as REMARKABLY PRECOCIOUS?>>
Don't rate them so. Read Dubliners, see what Joyce was up to at the same
age.
<<"It may yet turn out that racial differences are not as basic as questions
of money and power, but have served those who deplore them most, in keeping
us divided and so relatively poor and powerless.">>
I too found this the most interesting sentence in the Intro and spent some
time thinking about what was being said. I think it can be read two ways
but, as they are mutually exclusive, only one way or the other. "... served
those who deplore them most ..." can be read as meaning "serve the interests
of those who deplore them most" which seems to me a deeply cynical statement
and, by that, wildly provocative. It can also be read to mean "serves to
keep divided those who deplore them most"; i.e., works against the interests
of those who deplore them. I think the latter is what is intended, if only
because the first reading would certainly call for some elaboration on P's
part. How would those who deplore it be served? By providing them careers
and reputations heroically working in the movement? Or ... what?
If the latter, it makes more ready sense, saying simply that black and white
poor are more joined in their shared poverty (and lack of power) than they
are separated by their racial differences.
I'm sorry this is so scattershot and not more comprehensive.
Best,
malignd
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list