More Liberal Bias in the Media
MalignD at aol.com
MalignD at aol.com
Tue Oct 29 14:31:47 CST 2002
jbridel1 at rogers.com:
<<From the New York Times, a summary review of a new book claiming the
indigenous population of North America was going down anyway. The title of
he article: "Don't Blame Columbus for all the Indians' Ills".
"Europeans first came to the Western Hemisphere armed with guns, the cross
and, unknowingly, pathogens. Against the alien agents of disease, the
indigenous people never had a chance. Their immune systems were unprepared to
fight smallpox and measles, malaria and yellow fever. The epidemics that
resulted have been well documented. What had not been clearly recognized
until now, though, is that the general health of Native Americans had
apparently been deteriorating for centuries before 1492. That is the
conclusion of a team of anthropologists, economists and paleopathologists who
have completed a wide-ranging study of the health of people living in the
Western Hemisphere in the last 7,000 years."
I don't even know where to begin with this.... >>
Nor do I. For starters, what precisely are you trying to say? By "liberal
bias" do you mean bias by or against liberals? In either case, on what basis?
The article appeared in today's Science Times. It is a report of a study and
a book based on that study with contributions from some 50 scientists and
scholars. The four cited in the article were from four different
Universities OSU, Emory, U of Arkansas and Johns Hopkins.
Is it your position that these far-flung fifty are part of a cabal? That the
Times should be condemned for reporting and reviewing? That the finding most
discussed in the article--that there was a general decline in health over
time in various parts of pre-Columbian North America, i.e., a decline not
attributable to diseases transported by Europeans (although the role of
Europeans in spreading disease in NA is not disputed)--is a scientific ruse
intended to get the white man off the hook five hundred years later?
Perhaps, for those curious, you might try to begin.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list