move the Pale Fire discussison somewhere else

[David Morris]

--- Tim Strzechowski <dedalus204 at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> 1.  I still enjoy reading the PF posts in that they help "guide" my reading
of the novel to certain degree, but
> 
> 2.  I remain woefully disappointed in the lack of Pynchon-related context
throughout this read, despite the assurances early in June that such
connections would be "inevitable."

No such promises were ever made by the majority of those who signed on, nor
should there have been, though some have used this logic to try to beat the PF
read into the ground.

> [...] But, to be frank, I see little justification for the existence of the
PF read in this particular forum.

No one ever appointed you to the position of P-list nanny, so forgive us if we
ignore your above judgement.  Why you feel such judgements are worthy of our
consideration is a mystery.  If the owners of this list objected to this
reading they've had ample oppurtunity to say so.  So far, not a peep.

This Pale Fire reading is doing marvelously and should rather be garnering your
praises.

David Morris

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com