NP more Bush Nazi connection

[Richard Fiero]

Henry Secularpeturbations doesn't seem to be around to defend 
himself and wrote at different times:
1.
>man, i would like to read one credible paragraph on
>the connection of bush to nazis. just one. but it's
>all bull shit.

2.
>Looking back we see that presidents didn't always have
>a plan to deal with these complicated problems. Sure,
>they had lots of ideas, plans even... but Sometimes
>there was no logic, no principles ... just good old
>fashioned American seat of the pants working it out as
>we go...deducing, if we must,  after we move.

3.
>I disagree. It's not  an obvious point in GR that the
>V2 attacks are random. The randomness and the fear
>that they could land where they were not pointed is
>quite real, but one of the most obvious and important
>ambiguities in the novel, is the one about the
>randomness / percision of the V2 attacks, the rockets . . .

1. Bush a n[N]azi? Depends on your definition which can be 
strong (ADL), semi-strong or weak.
2. George II's plans are obvious: turn back the  New Deal, 
privatize the public goods and institute a faith-based foreign policy.
3. The mention of a Poisson distribution stood sore thumbwise 
in my reading of GR because it is counterintuitive to a naive 
view. I think the text does state that some characters supposed 
the V2 location impacts were meaningful but I don't believe 
that the text misleads the reader in expecting this.