politics and religion: christianity versus the pantheistic
Terrance
lycidas2 at earthlink.net
Thu Feb 20 07:53:45 CST 2003
s~Z wrote:
>
> >>>Very old documents unpoliticized and untouched by "Westerners"<<<
>
> So by unadulterated buddhism you mean buddhism not interpreted by westerners
> (Sears Buddhism) and are not referring to some distinct pure form of
> buddhism itself as opposed to sectarian buddhism adulterated in some fashion
> by buddhists?
Another yellow and white view, it seems, the good east and the bad west.
Those nasty westerners (Guilty! Who me? Eye, why eye, meeee, I'm,
western, right, but, guilty...) just fuck everything up. Everything they
touch turns into shit, money, and the word. Ha! Ha! Yeah, and that's why
we need one of the karmic machines to take the death palm western grip
off the mandate of heaven (ooooops, see that now, there I go slipping
into western translated logocentricity. or is it my logophobia again?)
These books are not available in Sanskrit:
Richard Robinson, The Buddhist Religion: A historical
Introduction
William R. LaFleur, The Karma of Words: Buddhism and the
Literary Arts in Medieval Japan (U of California Press
1983).
Nishida Kitaro (put a - over the o in his name). He is a Modern
Japanese Philosopher. He studied Kierrkegaard and others--"paradoxical
logic" and "Nothingness."
Say,
ierkegaard had a host of personas. Don't think he ever had
a bag lady under a bridge but if we assume that the author
is a religious author, all the works can be explained, and
the so called aesthetic works than appear as indirect
communications in which the author attempts to reach his
readers by beginning from where they are. The aesthetic
works are written over pseudonyms because, unlike the
religious works, they do not represent the position of
Kierkegaard himself.
"I represented a worldly irony, joie de vivre, the subtlest
form of pleasure-seeking--without a trace of "seriousness
and positivity;" on the other hand, I was prodigiously witty
and interesting."
--The Point Of View of My Work As An Author, Kierkegaard
How do you do, my name is Sue, Dunham
An emerging theme of Nishida Kitaro's later
works was expressed in the complex phrase "zettai
mujunteki jikodoitsu, " variously translated by
Schinzinger as "absolute contradictory
self-identity, " "the self-identity of absolute
contradictories," or more simply as "oneness" or
"unity" of opposites. The theory of contrariety or
opposition that Nishida (1870-1945) worked out
between 1927 and 1945 can be taken as a stimulus for
East/West comparative thought. This is so because of
the special significance of Nishida's thought, but
also more generally because contrariety is itself a
prime subject for comparative philosophy.
The eminent philosophical anthropologist Mircea
Eliade once said that "the union of opposites" is a
basic category of archaic ontology and comparative
world religions. Eliade's claim is contentious only
in that the reference to "union" subtly provides a
characterization and suggestion of a particular way
of conceptualizing felt oppositions and polarities.
The initial fact is that of felt opposition itself;
the ensuing demand or problematic is that of a
conceptual understanding of contrariety.
Like, that Karmic hammer and wheel in GR, it's like gnostic and like, in
VL, ah, is like that a real Karma, I mean a pure lands Karma or a Zen
master's Karma, a Buddhist-skeptic's Karma, a Hindu pre/post
Mahayana...Abhidharma Karma, or a Sears Karma?
Do you remember, your President Nixon?
Do you remember, the bills you have to pay
Or even yesterday?
Have you been an un-American?
All night
You want the un-American
un-American, un-American, you want the un-American
All right
You want the un-American
Well, it ain't that Barbie doll...
Been un-seasonably mild here in Northeast America even as the days
continue
to shrink. Sunday I rode 50 miles in the sun--Instant Karma.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list