pynchon-l-digest V2 #3389

[Mondegreen]

Somebody call the exorcist

>Subject: Re: (Nabokov-free) P-list hypocrites' true colors
>>>>for all time, you pathetic drizzling anus.........<<<
>Oh my. Pretty please with sugar on it, stop? Now we're supposed to stop
>joking with each other? If you don't like my posts, feel free to delete
>them.
>>>Please stop.
>Subject: Re: (Nabokov-free) P-list hypocrites' true colors
>We could all stop.  We have for the most part.  But he'll never stop.  He
>can't stand not being the center of attention here.
>Well, you recalled it wrong, dumb-dumb.
>>>>We could all stop.<<<
>Then let's.
>Stop what, exactly?
>Speaking of "feverish",  I've said enough about the
>brain-dead fqmorris today.
>Those are two out of thousands of the many tedious things you've posted that
>bear some relevance to TP.
>We're trying to read a book here.   Why not just go away?
>We're trying to read a book here.   Why not just go away?   <BR>
>> Really: take a hint; go away.ose interested in Pale Fire aren't Pynchon
>>readers=
>?   <BR>
><BLOCKQUOTE CITE STYLE=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT:
>5px;=20=
>MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px" TYPE=3D"CITE"></FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#0=
>00000" FACE=3D"Geneva" FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" SIZE=3D"2"><BR>
>>Why not just go
>> away?
>Please, you first.
>> What you are is a sad case, a spectacle.
>>>>Speaking of "feverish",  I've said enough about the
>brain-dead fqmorris today.<<<
no need to relate to Pynchon
>You believe and think as an idolator believes...
and
>you spam this list with your simple-minded borrowings.
>> Well, you recalled it wrong, dumb-dumb.
>You would appear to be mistaken, my trash-talking
>friend:
>And you're here, every day, all day long, insulting
>first one and then another P-lister...why, exactly?
>Might it be that you have some compulsion, some
>unresolved issues that push you into this behavior?
  -- no need to relate to Pynchon
>> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
This is after all, as you say, frequently, with
>every other breath, like a maniac, the PYNCHON-LIST.
may offer insights into what we as readers do and how we do it.
  what does this have to do with Pynchon
 don't worry about it, go away,
we're talking
>about what we want to talk about no matter what
>anybody says, & etc.
>> you're ...
>>You're ...
>>you are .....
>>You're ....
I think Pale
>> Fire would be an appropriate group read
>And so would the morning newspaper.
>> > I've been impressed by the quality of the Nabokov/Pale Fire discussion
>thus
>> far
We did not decide to take your all-knowing advice.
>I never claimed to be "all-knowing."
>> > What you are is
>Might it be that you have some compulsion,
>Do you Yahoo!?
>> Well, you recalled it wrong, dumb-dumb.
>You would appear to be mistaken, my trash-talking
[omitted]
>Cc: pynchon-l@[omitted]
>That happens to me when I read PG Wodehouse. A topical application of
>hydrocortisone clears it right up.
("dogg", "dirty dog", "you dog/old dog" etc)
the despicable state of a
>young gentleman of good family. 'Sir, when I
>heard of him last, he was running about town
>shooting cats.'